September 10, 2020

Religious Conservative Groups Lose Again In RFRA Lawsuit

Article origination IPBS-RJC
Attorney Jim Bopp represents religious conservative groups trying to strike down the so-called "fix" to Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA. - Brandon Smith/IPB News

Attorney Jim Bopp represents religious conservative groups trying to strike down the so-called "fix" to Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA.

Brandon Smith/IPB News

Indiana religious conservative groups lost again in court Thursday in their multi-year legal battle to discriminate against same-sex couples.

The lawsuit challenges the so-called “fix” to the state’s controversial Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or RFRA. The RFRA fix said the 2015 law’s religious freedom defense couldn’t be used to justify denying service to someone based on characteristics such as age, race, sexual orientation or gender identity.

But the religious conservative groups argued in court that they want to discriminate against the LGBTQ community. And that’s why they said the fix and local anti-discrimination ordinances infringed on their religious beliefs, thus violating the Constitution.

However, a county judge found last year there’s no evidence the groups actively discriminate, nor have any cities tried to assess fines or penalties – and thus the groups had no case. The Indiana Court of Appeals agreed.

“In short,” the appellate court wrote, “the companies remain free, without interference, to express their religious views on marriage and human sexuality as they always have.”

Contact reporter Brandon at bsmith@ipbs.org or follow him on Twitter at @brandonjsmith5.

Support independent journalism today. You rely on WFYI to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Donate to power our nonprofit reporting today. Give now.

 

Related News

Hoosiers to spend slightly less on Thanksgiving compared to 2023 prices
Indiana more than $300M off its budget plan through four months of fiscal year
Hydrogen project at BP enters planning phase. Residents worry safety concerns not being heard