May 18, 2020

Indiana Supreme Court Ducks Holcomb's Question On Curtis Hill

Article origination IPBS-RJC
The Indiana Supreme Court refused to tell Gov. Eric Holcomb whether he can appoint a replacement for Attorney General Curtis Hill. - Lauren Chapman/IPB News

The Indiana Supreme Court refused to tell Gov. Eric Holcomb whether he can appoint a replacement for Attorney General Curtis Hill.

Lauren Chapman/IPB News

The Indiana Supreme Court refused to tell Gov. Eric Holcomb whether he can appoint a replacement for Attorney General Curtis Hill.

Hill’s law license is suspended for 30 days after the court last week ruled he criminally battered four women.

State law isn’t clear on whether that suspension means Hill vacates the office. If he did, the governor has the right to name a replacement. So, Holcomb asked the Supreme Court to weigh in.

But the court says the disciplinary case against Hill is finished and Holcomb has no right to intervene. The justices did not answer the question of whether a 30-day license suspension means Hill can’t return to his office in a month.

Hill last week said his chief deputy Aaron Negangard will run the office until he returns.

Contact Brandon at bsmith@ipbs.org or follow him on Twitter at @brandonjsmith5.

Support independent journalism today. You rely on WFYI to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Donate to power our nonprofit reporting today. Give now.

 

Related News

Indiana bill to punish people sleeping outside fails, but language could come back
Safe Park Indy looks to add a second Indianapolis location as waitlist grows
Advocates warn election results could lead to more limits on reproductive rights