March 14, 2019

Appeals Court Rules Against Indiana University In Abortion Lawsuit

Original story from   IPBS-RJC

Article origination IPBS-RJC
Indiana University sued the state over a 2016 anti-abortion law bars anyone from acquiring, receiving, selling, or transferring aborted fetal tissue.  - WFIU/WTIU

Indiana University sued the state over a 2016 anti-abortion law bars anyone from acquiring, receiving, selling, or transferring aborted fetal tissue.

WFIU/WTIU

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that parts of an Indiana anti-abortion law are not too vague to be constitutional, reversing a lower court decision.

It's the state’s first court victory over the controversial 2016 measure.

Part of a 2016 anti-abortion law bars anyone from acquiring, receiving, selling, or transferring aborted fetal tissue. Indiana University sued; it uses fetal tissue in its medical research.

A federal district judge ruled in favor of IU. She said the law’s terms and definitions were too vague to be enforced.

But the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals disagrees. It rules that if the measure’s language is too vague, then much of existing law would also be unconstitutional. And its decision says IU should bring a lawsuit in Indiana state court to bring clarity to the statute.

The appellate court has previously struck down other provisions of that 2016 law.

Support independent journalism today. You rely on WFYI to stay informed, and we depend on you to make our work possible. Donate to power our nonprofit reporting today. Give now.

 

Related News

Judge hears attempt to throw out terminated pregnancy report lawsuit, expects to have decision soon
Days after amending complaint, attorney general voluntarily dismisses IU Health lawsuit
Lack of data fuels concerns as new slots for Medicaid waivers are set to open July 1